The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has repeatedly clarified that even before taking over government, and especially after winning the September 16 elections, it already had a clear plan on how to revive the country’s economy.
Instead of waiting patiently to see this plan unfold, the opposition has already begun creating confusion and misrepresenting the DPP’s efforts, despite the party having a well-established system of governance.
Regarding the national budget, the Economic Recovery Plan, and the ATM agenda (Agriculture, Tourism, and Mining), the DPP has emphasized that the government’s allocation of funds to agriculture and road infrastructure is evidence of its commitment to economic restoration—not an attempt to gain praise through unnecessary road construction.
The free education policy is progressing gradually and thoughtfully to avoid destabilising the system. The government has removed tuition fees, while boarding fees remain under review to ensure they do not strain school budgets, since boarding students require continuous care.
For example, some schools rely on boarding fees to pay staff or purchase food; removing them abruptly would disrupt the education system.
The reform of FISP should not be mistaken for DPP’s failure to govern. Rather, it demonstrates the removal of corruption and confusion caused by individuals who do not understand the realities faced by most Malawians.
DPP wants only deserving citizens to receive government support, instead of benefits being hoarded like “cabbage leaves.”
For instance, before September 16, many “ghost beneficiaries” — especially in the Central Region — were unlawfully receiving government farm inputs. Eliminating this malpractice is not a mistake, despite opposition claims.
The opposition should offer solutions, not merely criticise without providing alternatives. They must avoid using reckless statements claiming that “the opposition is a graveyard.” For their arguments to be meaningful, they should clearly outline what they want improved between now and 2030.
For example, asking where government funds will come from is valid — but they must also propose their own strategies, as they would if they were in power.
Malawi is facing global and regional challenges that require unity, not fear-mongering for political gain.
Rising prices, climate change impacts, and disruptions in global supply chains are affecting every nation, not Malawi alone.
Therefore, blaming the DPP and demanding instant economic transformation is unreasonable.
Constructive contributions in Parliament remain essential. Just as many countries are struggling with high fuel and food prices, Malawi is no exception. What is needed are solutions, not intimidation or panic.
